0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. However, there are circumstances (whether you’re using Synology Surveillance Station or simply need an extremely performant system) where Ext4 is the right selection. EXT4 vs. wbeater • 3 yr. I understand if I use zfs/btrfs i will miss out on any data redundancy features but maybe pick up some added features like better consistency, snapshots, ect or should I just stick with ext4. . Linux 5. Squid mentioned above that we can create a . The two primary reasons I use btrfs are easy to setup and maintain RAID arrays, and. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS file systems File systems like ZFS, EXT4, and BTRFS may seem strange or. Btrfs was developed specifically to facilitate quick administration and maintenance. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. Viewed 6k times. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. No swap because 16GB RAM is enough for me. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. You can sometimes run into bugs and issues if your home directory is partitioned in XFS, BTRFS, or ZFS. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. 1. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. 7. For storage, XFS is great and. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. With ZFS ZVOLs, you can run other file systems like ext4 or xfs for special situations (like as storage for VMs) and still get snapshots/block checksumming. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. 15 or newer (Please the same OS using same activating services and same apps!)The snapshots do not take up any space. Btrfs lacks maturity and stability at the time of this writing but is more feature-rich compared to EXT4. If fs performance is the only or most important thing for you, then use xfs - it's the clear winner, by far. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. Mar 14, 2012. 29 release of the Linux kernel. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen Dateien als EXT4. Snapshot support. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. With 4K random reads by FIO, the SATA/USB performance was flat across the. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. El sistema de archivos es mayor de 2 TiB con inodos de 512 bytes. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. Better for gaming, my money is on ZFS if you have extra RAM to spare and restrict the cache size. Phoronix: Linux 4. Pro: supported by all distro's, commercial and not, and based on ext3, so it's widely tested, stable and proven. One of the main reasons the XFS file system is used is for its support of large chunks of data. This file system enables drive pooling, automatic snapshot, transparent compression, and online defragmentation. Comparison of archive formats. But yeah, it's (BTRFS) a more complex filesystem with a bottomless pit of asterisks and gotchas attached to it, EXT4 is much more limited in scope and much simpler from a design perspective. - Linux Kernel 5. Ext3, or Ext4) to the Btrfs file system using the btrfs-convert tool. Vide. While it is possible to migrate from ext4 to XFS, it. Nowadays btrfs is very stable and the tools to recover from fs corruption have been getting much better as well. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. All of these Linux. Agree, actually I have a bunch of freebsd for ZFS. (ext4 for general use, xfs for MythTV) On the other hand, I lost an entire filesystem with btrfs - the utilities couldn't identify anything on the (raid-1) drives as btrfs, it wasn't just corrupted, it went missing. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. Recommended for general use. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDs Storage :. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. I currently have a ds1819+, currently, i have 8 x 4tb (5400rpm) 32G of ram 2x2tb nvme cachethe system is super fragmented and super slow synology says that i need to backup everything and recreate the volume. Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. All have pros and cons. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. And xfs. On each drive make a media share folder join them with mergerfs for the shows if you want a drive for redundancy their is a raid you can use. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. "EXT4 does not support concurrent writes, XFS does" (But) EXT4 is more "mainline"Btrfs is licensed under the GPL and is open source. EXT4 vs. ZFS, the Zettabyte file system, was developed as part of the Solaris operating system created by Sun Microsystems. All of these Linux. and. Comparison of file archivers. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. 1. jkool702. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. For pure data storage, however, the btrfs is the winner over the ext4, but time still will tell. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. F2FS vs. XFS. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. XFS vs. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. A File system is one of the most important aspects that af. On the SSD, Bcachefs came in behind EXT4 again but faster than Btrfs while XFS and F2FS were the fastest for SQLite on this consumer. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. However we have a new contender - ZFS performed *extremely* well on the. Diferenças básicas entre o Ext4 e o Btrfs. But to be honest, it might be easier for me to work around than the lack of the possibility for single-file clone that btrfs, XFS etc. - Btrfs hỗ trợ tính năng pool trên ổ cứng. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. This feature allows for increased capacity and reliability. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. Actually, Btrfs might have the upper hand there even, if zstd filesystem compression is used. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. 1. The archlinux article Solid State Drives says in the section Choice of Filesystem:. 這裡有 4 個關於 EXT4 和 Btrfs 的附加問題。在這裡查看答案。 1. But as some users found out, automatic snapshot (at the time it was first released) ate disk space on single user installations. Hey guys, I’m also in this quest of finding out the best configs for the temp drives. Ext4 is kind of the "tried and true" old file system that works and has good performance, but lacks many modern features, like snapshots, subvolumes, etc. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. Hardwareseitig gibt es bei Btrfs jedoch Ausnahmen. Add to Chrome Add to Edge Add to Firefox Add to Opera Add to Brave Add to Safari. Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. 6. zfs not. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. We also provide useful. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. To recommend a suitable file system, I need to know the exact purpose of /tmp. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. Btrfs Btrfs support has been included with the mainline 2. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. 4. After conversion I: enabled compression. I’d still choose ZFS. For storage, XFS is great and sometimes has higher performance than EXT4. The server I'm working with is: The server came with a bunch of 72GB SAS drives, but I also have 500GB and 240GB 2. Also BRTFS compresses the file system using less space compared to EXT4 but again the tradeoff is it uses more computer. Last updated on Aug 4, 2023 All File Systems How do you compare btrfs with other file systems like ZFS, ext4, or XFS? Powered by AI and the LinkedIn community File systems are an essential. The question is XFS vs EXT4. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. XFS does not require extensive reading. NVMe drives formatted to 4096k. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that. The Btrfs filesystem supports read-only and writable snapshots of the file. The answer is zfs. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. ZFS likes eating RAM. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. Regardless what I'm doing the maximum transferrate (write) is between 40-60MB on ZFS. Offizieller Beitrag. BTRFS. The only issue with it is that its built-in RAID 5/6 functionality is still not usable and can lead to data loss. 8 snapshot as of last week. Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is presented as a default file system, as well as it is faster than the btrfs when transferring files. Example: Dropbox is hard-coded to use ext4, so will refuse to work on ZFS and BTRFS. EXT2/3/4: Extended Filesystem is by far the most popular filesystem among Linux desktop installations. The ext4 file system records information about when a file was last accessed and there is a cost associated with recording it. Example: Dropbox is hard-coded to use ext4, so will refuse to work on ZFS and BTRFS. You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. Phoronix has a ton of reviews, Google for them. at least as much as ext4 (which isn’t all that trusted by SUSE). Snapshots. As a last resort, you could try btrfs-convert-n. Ext4 se basa en una tecnología más antigua, por lo que carece de las características modernas del sistema de archivos que se encuentran en sistemas como E2FS y BtrFS. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen. It's not the fastest but not exactly a slouch. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. . However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. A) crater. 7 - Btrfs vs. sandoxe • 4 yr. F2FS vs. ZFS combines a filesystem and volume manager. That is according to my quick read of various Phoronix tests. 88. BtrFS refers to B-Tree File Systems developed by Oracle to establish an alternative to the Ext series. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. 4. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. Some think of the B-tree file system as a better, more modern alternative to ext4. The maximum partition size of a btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, and the maximum file size is also 16 exbibytes. Hello guy's "EXT4 vs BTRFS" -that's the question *Let me guess what will happen, you guys will jump in and comment technical replies* But that's not the case here Imagine: There is someone that he/she does not have that much knowledge about Linux. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. Also consider XFS, which works better for extremely large files. 0 X. It also wasn't formatted with -m finobt=1 which is a game-changer for XFS performance with small files and heavy metadata updates. Watching LearnLinuxTV's Proxmox course, he mentions that ZFS offers more features and better performance as the host OS filesystem, but also uses a lot of RAM. For SSDs, F2FS really is a hands down winner still, although EXT4 and XFS are catching up, they still lose. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is. checksum verification on each file. Ext4 specially without a journal and XFS are both extremely fast. It's got good features. It's the fastest option bar none if you have enough RAM. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). As far as I know (please someone correct me), ZFS needs equally sized drives to work, BTRFS can handle differently sized drives. BTRFS has (by far) the better ecosystem of tools and utilities. That being said, it is meant as a temporary solution to migrate data to a native Unix file system, such as ZFS or UFS. For example, in the case of Btrfs, SATA SSDs are showing around a 10%. My recommendation of that list would be XFS. Key Btrfs features Perhaps the most important feature is the checksumming of all data. i use the nas to store backups (the tools created a bunch of symbolic links) (not from synology) and run a few dockers (a. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. ago. Just so perfect to roll back for some games and modding. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. Btrfs was 107% faster in initial read scores and 24% faster in initial write scores. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. In Windows NTFS is used, while in Mac OS it is HFS, perhaps these will sound familiar to you, especially the typical FAT or its variants for. Otherwise, I don't think you'd notice the performance difference. ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. wbeater • 3 yr. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. The host is proxmox 7. , not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. It provides an unlimited subdirectory. But. Some feel that it is not mature enough for production use while there are also early adopters of this. Comentado el. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. I switched from ext4 to btrfs a couple of years ago. all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. . List of archive formats. BTRFS系统性能最差，下面是去掉该系统其它3种的对比. Utilice. Miscellaneous 9 mins read This article will look at the difference between the Btrfs vs. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. XFSI've drank the kool-aid and I both run btrfs on root, /home, and for a 1 TB data drive. Try it now. This is useful, though far less complete than the block-by-block checksums of btrfs and ZFS. • 2 yr. Even after then I was able to transfer data out of the filesystem. SSD optimization. Rep: XFS has unbalanced performance, but in the best use case blows away many other formats. That filesystem is now xfs. /etc/fstab /dev/sda5 / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1 Doing so breaks applications that rely on access time, see fstab#atime options for possible solutions. data, so it's possible to only keep the metadata with redundancy ("dup" is the default BTRFS behaviour on HDDs). XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. This article provides a detailed comparison of XFS vs btrfs to help you determine which file system is a better fit for your use case. Otherwise it's sort of figuring out what features you want to drop. It can store large files and has advanced features as compared to Ext2 and Ext3. Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. This is what I ended up doing; BTRFS for operating system partition and ext4 for games. El tipo de archivo Ext4 admite tamaños de partición de hasta 1 EiB (Exibyte). Because ext4 is deficient as an enterprise level fs, Red Hat has spent quite a. I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. Your gaming performance shouldn't be affected by either, since games are mostly just reads anyways. Now Fedora just needs to implement it properly like openSUSE. Bcachefs is the file-system born out of the Linux kernel's block cache code and has been worked on the past several years by. If you are running a more stable system like Dabian based Linux EXT4 is a better choice because it's faster file system but not as easy to revert. Both file systems can recover from a power loss, but using Btrfs will not immunize you from them. The Ext4 filesystem does not support creating snapshots of the filesystem. So I think you should have no strong preference, except to consider what you are familiar with and what is best documented. Here are some more benchmarks. I think you can trust XFS. That one is solid and mature. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. I'm not asking "What is the best filesystem?"—There is no such thing as 'the. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. Ext4 file systems. WD & Windows vs. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. This is equivalent to specifying -m single on the command. Ext4 Ext4 is another filesystem that has support for SSD. BTRFS has a number of issues with optimizations (mostly minor) and Problems with Scrubbing and Raid56. ago. It utilizes a b+tree structure instead of the traditional linear layout found in most filesystems today, allowing it to better manage larger datasets more efficiently than other systems like ext4 or Xfs. . Ext4 and Btrfs Filesystems are pretty much well known for their performance in Linux environments. If you don't need consistency supported by a filesystem, you can use ext4 with journal option off, F2FS (when a program that use /tmp. . But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. With the noatime option, the access timestamps on the filesystem are not updated. Comparison of file archivers. Use whatever your distro vendor supports: on Redhat and spinoffs, use XFS+LVM (the latter gives you snapshotting capabilities today;: XFS itself will receive them in the medium term), on Suse use BTRFS. Linux có nhiều tùy chọn hệ thống file khác nhau. Looking at benchmarks however it seems to have poor. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. I heard BRTFS filesystem with continuous trim and unit allocation size of 64kb are the best configs so far. 和 ext4 和 XFS 一起使用的工具比较 法律通告 Settings Close. #11. Btrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. The SATA 3. Btrfs would be adding features you most likely don't need. The ZFS file system combines a volume manager and file. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. LVM has snapshots. After reading a few articles I decided to use JFS in favour of XFS. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. Also I've thought about btrfs again. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. ext4 is an "advanced" version of ext3 with various improvements, basically an upgrade to the ext3 format. As cotas XFS não são uma opção remountable. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. btrfs is da bomb yo. Pro: supported by all distro's, commercial and not, and based on ext3, so it's widely tested, stable and proven. - Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi thực hiện backup. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. Hi, I think BTRFS is actually faster then ZFS on Linux. Ext4 vs ext3. However, I was using the openSUSE's default partition layout, which is btrfs for / and xfs for /home. If you have a NAS or Home server, BTRFS or XFS can offer benefits but then you'll have to do some extensive reading first. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. Higher scores are better. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. Since btrfs does not work like a normal partition, but uses volumes and subvolumes per default on fedora, you may see other challenges. F2FS vs. EXT4 VS BTRFS. - Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi thực hiện backup. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. For more than 3 disks, or a spinning disk with ssd, zfs starts to look very interesting. btrfs is also slower in some benchmarks but I very much doubt thats visible in normal use. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. There was obviously some caching / lack of committing to disk involved that led to faster performance while the Btrfs file-system was in line with real-world expectations out of the. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. , power failure) could be acceptable. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. And I don't know if btrfs is right thing for my server. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. 7. Thanks. 3. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. - Btrfs hỗ trợ tính năng pool trên ổ cứng. Es un sistema de archivos actualizado y también fiable. The first way is mkfs. It supports all. This was done from an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX system with ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME motherboard, 4 x 8GB DDR4-3200 memory, and. 0 unterstützt. XFS and btrfs are two advanced file systems for Linux that offer significant improvements over ext4. The inode system creates a separate table on each. NT-based Windows did not have any support for FAT32 up to. e. ZFS also has more options for caches and such things than EXT4. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。 Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. EXT4. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Add a comment. 其實你提到一個重點了. Complementing the benchmarks from yesterday are some more results today with Bcachefs compared to EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and F2FS with testing being done from the same Intel M. ZFS. Especially things that cause lots of file-internal fragementation like databases. Ext4 comes up with some new and improved features such as: Extent-based. Running this fio command, I get about 2. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. XFS and ext4 are probably where I'd look for a single disk hard drive. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. BtrFS RAID 6 implementation is "mostly working", see here:As some of you likely know, I have a favorable view of ZFS and especially of MySQL on ZFS. A snapshot is a subvolume that shares its data and metadata with another subvolume, using COW capabilities. 3 which makes XFS v5 the default and all the benefits it brings. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. A：BTRFS系能最差，不到20 seeks/sec.